Climate emergency requires an urgent response
The panel also discussed the balance between quick, tactical solutions and deeper change.
Rueda called for urgent solutions to match the urgency of the challenges, although the panellists agreed that quick solutions like bike lanes, if not implemented successfully, may not receive public support.
Considering the urgency of the climate emergency, Professor Mark Jacques from the School of Architecture and Urban Design at RMIT considered that it might be time to evolve the superblock model.
“The model could include more radical ways of altering the city that go beyond road paint and furnishing,” he said.
Jacques cited Australian examples such as Nightingale Village, the Better Breese Block and A Park Close to Home – initiatives that look to opportunistically and quickly claim space from vehicles and use that space to maximise planting to counter urban heat.
The panel agreed that policymakers must strike a balance between the impact of the solutions and the speed they can be rolled out, while considering costs, benefits and public opinion.
“As urbanists we are worried about it, but we see that it’s possible to solve it," said Millet.
In his closing remarks, Rueda reminded us of the urgency of the problem, citing a recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report that expects temperatures to rise by 1.5 and 7 degrees Celsius by the end of the century.
“With 3 degrees Celsius of warming, Spain will not be habitable; this may even arrive before the end of the century," he said.
“It’s a very serious problem and we need urgent solutions."
RMIT's School of Global, Urban and Social Studies has recently appointed Rueda as a Visiting Professor as well as signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Rueda's foundation, the Fundacion Ecología Urbana y Territorial (FEUT).
Story: Hannah Raymond